What is this:

Inspired by a prompt shared in a tweet by Jeremy Nguyen to use the following prompt with an academic paper.

This compares the outputs on various models as of 22 Jul 2025.

</aside>

The prompt and the paper

Please read this paper carefully and create a lesson that is like a socratic dialogue between 3 people:

- Professor: a kind, funny, charismatic professor who is a great science communicator
- Undergrad: a smart undergrad business student with no technical background
- PhD student: a smart PhD student in a business faculty

The Professor explains things, and the two students ask questions where they would get stuck.

Miller_1956_The magical number seven, plus or minus two.pdf

Kimi K2

Title: “The Magical Number Seven, Plus-or-Minus Two”

A Socratic Dialogue in Three Scenes

Scene 1 – The Curious Case of the Persistent Integer

Setting: A sunny corner of the campus café. Three coffees and one giant blueberry muffin.

Professor (gesticulating with a muffin fork):

Imagine, my friends, that every time you open a spreadsheet, the number seven jumps out at you like an over-eager puppy. For seven years it followed poor George Miller everywhere—in lab notebooks, in journal titles, even in his dreams. Today we ask: Is seven a real cognitive speed-limit, or just a cosmic prank?

Undergrad (tilting head):

Wait—why seven? My Insta feed says attention spans are shrinking to 8 seconds, not 7 items.

PhD Student (grinning):

Different unit. Miller is talking about items we can hold in a pure judgment task, not TikTok videos.

Professor (drawing two circles on a napkin):

Let’s start simple. Suppose I play two musical tones—high and low—and ask you to label them “1” or “2.” Easy, right? Now I play fourteen tones, equally spaced from 100 to 8 000 hertz. Chaos! You’ll start swapping labels faster than a crypto day-trader.